• The Stauffers are YouTube personalities who chronicled their adoption journey.
  • They only revealed that they “rehomed” the kid after making loads of cash off of him.
  • The Stauffer scandal highlights a much bigger downside that plagues all of influencer tradition.

If that is the primary time you’ve heard of the Stauffers, you’re not alone.

The Ohio couple — whose names are Myka and James — have been sharing “their parenting journey” on their YouTube channel since 2014. They’ve solely turn out to be well-known previously two years, after they started chronicling their adoption journey.

However now they’ve made headlines for all of the fallacious causes — and in so doing, they’ve inadvertently uncovered the toxicity of influencer tradition as a complete.

The Stauffers aren’t getting sympathy from their followers. | Supply: Twitter

The Stauffers ‘Rehomed’ Their Adopted Little one

In 2017, the Stauffers started the adoption. Myka Stauffer stated that she and her husband had been adopting a “particular wants youngster” — whom they’d title Huxley — from China. And, in typical influencer style, she monetized the complete course of.

After producing greater than 27 monetized movies chronicling the adoption, plugging a fundraiser for “Huxley’s particular wants,” and charging $5 an individual to “unlock a puzzle piece” that includes Huxley’s face, the Stauffers determined to “rehome” Huxley.

After a number of assessments, after a number of evaluations, quite a few medical professionals have felt that he wanted a unique slot in his medical wants, he wanted extra.

Whereas the Stauffers’ tears moved a choose few “followers,” the overwhelming majority known as them out for his or her reckless conduct.

Influencer Tradition Is Poisonous

It appears relatively gross — to place it mildly — that the Stauffers had no downside profiting off of their particular wants youngster, however appeared reluctant to really take the steps to be proactive and engaged mother and father.

Not everybody needs kids. That’s okay. There are a variety of the explanation why individuals select to not have kids, and all these causes are legitimate and ought to be honored.

However should you select to have kids, it’s your accountability because the guardian to lift that youngster, whether or not that youngster has “particular wants” or not. And the Stauffers not solely selected to have kids, however in addition they selected to undertake a baby — and this particular wants youngster, specifically. So, Huxley’s situation was no shock.

However that appears to be indicative of the seedy underbelly of influencer tradition: appearances are extra necessary than actuality.

It’s extra necessary for Instagram fashions to seem wealthy than to be wealthy, which is why so a lot of them stay in studio flats whereas flexing about Gucci baggage.

It’s extra necessary for Instagram influencers to seem influential than to be influential, which is why so a lot of them purchase followers and inflate engagement.

And it’s extra necessary for the Stauffers to seem like good mother and father than to be good mother and father, which is why they’d no downside giving their youngster away like he was an object accumulating mud within the basement as a substitute of a dwelling, respiratory human being.

Influencer tradition is poisonous. And it’s time to make it come to an finish.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this article don’t essentially mirror the views of CCN.com.

This text was edited by Josiah Wilmoth.


Supply hyperlink