Home Coins Ethereum (ETH) Don’t just blame DeFi for paying high ETH gas fees

Don’t just blame DeFi for paying high ETH gas fees

Dont just blame DeFi for paying high ETH gas fees

Transaction costs on the Ethereum blockchain are at record highs, and no one will let you forget it. Reports often detail how decentralized finance platforms are the cause of ever-rising gas fees — tokens paid to miners who confirm and enable transactions on the Ethereum blockchain. Yes, DeFi does play a role, but the problem is institutional. 

Some exchanges, custodians and asset managers have been using multisignature platforms to secure their digital assets. Several years ago, multisig was viewed as a respected attempt to prevent private keys from being compromised. Despite initial adoption, numerous shortcomings have made institutions both question and transition from the multisig approach, in many cases replacing it with multiparty computation, or MPC, infrastructure.

Among many disadvantages, multisig platforms are not natively supported on the Ethereum blockchain. Instead, institutions are required to execute smart contracts that implement the multisig logic — i.e., a smart contract that accepts deposits and requires multiple signatures to withdraw from it.

Creating these multisig smart contracts to secure exchange clients’ funds involves gas fees, which cost millions of dollars. But it’s not just people’s wallets that have been suffering. Because fees are denominated in Ether (ETH), a more congested network may lead to slower development of Ethereum-based projects.

Multisig gas economics

Creating a multisig wallet implemented as a smart contract costs over 1 million gas units (approximately $30 at current value). In addition, every deposit or withdrawal costs more than 100,000 gas units. Therefore, multisig institutions end up paying a higher fee, given they have chosen to use a smart contract function.

In contrast to the creation of a single signature MPC wallet, there are no wallet creation fees and deposits, and withdrawals cost a standard 21,000 gas units.

Given gas deposit fees are paid by end-users, any institution implementing a smart contract may initially think this wallet creation fee is simply a one-time operation. Unfortunately, there is still another major issue with multisig addresses on the Ethereum network that results in another unnecessary fee: attribution.

Attribution

When an institution such as an exchange wants to identify deposits from different users, it creates a unique receive address for each client.

Unlike the Bitcoin network and other blockchains, Ethereum does not permit a transaction to include multiple inputs. Therefore, institutions will instead forward all deposits from each client’s unique receive address to a secure address where withdrawals are made.

The usual workaround to receive addresses for institutions is to use a forwarding contract or a way to forward any incoming funds to a new location (the omnibus multisig wallet). While this achieves attribution, it’s also one more smart contract that needs to be implemented.

Creating a forwarding contract costs around 200,000 gas units; depositing the forwarding contract costs approximately 60,000 gas units. These are all needless costs, further congesting the Ethereum blockchain.

Cost of doing business?

Suppose a new crypto exchange is seeking to establish its Ethereum wallet infrastructure with a separate receive address for each client. Based on the above pricing, if the exchange used a multisig infrastructure, it would pay $6 every time it signed up a new client and created a new receive address for them. This is before the client even deposits any funds.

The exchange will likely view this as part of its customer acquisition costs or the cost of doing business (if they’re even aware of this incurred cost, to begin with).

A recent report states that Coinbase has 35 million customers. At today’s prices, it would cost $245 million to set up a multisig infrastructure to support said clients — whether or not these clients choose to conduct transactions.

A solution to the problem

As with any maturing market, institutions have experienced increased fee compression over time, and firms have been seeking methods to scale their business at a lower cost without compromising on security.

If institutions could reassess their underlying infrastructure and consider a solution that is not dependent on an individual blockchain for support, they could easily reduce expenditure and limit infrastructure set-up fees. Gas fee payments to simply mirror multisig infrastructure on Ethereum would become a thing of the past.

Using alternative systems would go a long way in reducing the congestion on the second-largest blockchain.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Josh Schwartz is the chief operating officer at Curv — a New York-based digital asset security infrastructure firm — where he brings his background of leadership in both digital assets and traditional financial services with a specialization in market structure and trading technology.

Source link

- Advertisement -
Mr Bitcointe
Mr Bitcointehttps://www.bitcointe.com/
“Fact You Need To Know About Cryptocurrency - The first Bitcoin purchase was for pizza.” ― Mohsin Jameel
473FansLike
76FollowersFollow
4,567FollowersFollow
5,261FollowersFollow
1,581FollowersFollow
2,230SubscribersSubscribe
USD - United States Dollar
EUR
1.16
GBP
1.28
CHF
1.08
NOK
0.10
JPY
0.01
CAD
0.75
AUD
0.70

Most Popular

Novogratz: Dangerous Time to Be in Stocks, Bitcoin Has More Upside Than Gold

Galaxy Digital CEO Michael Novogratz explains why it is a dangerous time to be in the stock market right now, leading up...

PoFi Network | Zero Transaction Fees | High Throughput

In this video, we're introducing PoFi network and their line of products on the roadmap.→ Follow me on 👉Twitter: 👉Instagram:🚀 LET'S TALK...

Sunday News. Hello everyone, how are you? | by Yohann LIBOT | RealTPlatform | Sep, 2020

Hello everyone, how are you?A small article today to announce some small changes within RealT.The first info is related to the payment day...

$2.4 Trillion Stimulus Package Proposed in US With Second Direct Payments to Americans

A new stimulus package costing about $2.4 trillion is being prepared in the U.S. that includes a second round of stimulus checks for...
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 10,729.05
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 353.78
ripple
XRP (XRP) $ 0.241760
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999934
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 225.98
bitcoin-cash-sv
Bitcoin SV (BSV) $ 169.89
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 45.90
eos
EOS (EOS) $ 2.57
binancecoin
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 25.90
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 6.16
tezos
Tezos (XTZ) $ 2.17
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 1.25
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.100875
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 98.36
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.072964
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 10.75
huobi-token
Huobi Token (HT) $ 4.62
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.026462
usd-coin
USD Coin (USDC) $ 1.00
dash
Dash (DASH) $ 68.19
neo
NEO (NEO) $ 21.09
iota
IOTA (MIOTA) $ 0.258533
nem
NEM (XEM) $ 0.121457
zcash
Zcash (ZEC) $ 55.07
maker
Maker (MKR) $ 496.03
paxos-standard
Paxos Standard (PAX) $ 1.00
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 5.39
vechain
VeChain (VET) $ 0.012716
true-usd
TrueUSD (TUSD) $ 1.00
ftx-token
FTX Token (FTT) $ 3.59
kucoin-shares
KuCoin Shares (KCS) $ 0.899894
waves
Waves (WAVES) $ 2.48