Home Coins AMLT (AMLT) The Key To Compliance with Travel Rule Regulations – Coinfirm

The Key To Compliance with Travel Rule Regulations – Coinfirm


Most of the conversation around Travel Rule recommendations for cryptocurrency transactions has focused on two aspects of what is required to help prevent money laundering and other financial crimes. 

Firstly, the information about counterparties to a transaction that must be transmitted. Secondly, the requirements for VASPs who originate, transmit, and settle virtual transactions.

When considering solutions that deliver on Travel Rule requirements, however, the ability for regulators to carry out effective oversight must also become a priority. VASPs must be aware that regulatory oversight is coming and know what they should expect as the minimum in order to maintain full audit trails of compliant transactions. 

In the Travel Rule recommendations, the FATF recognised the need for the appropriate supervision. Simply put, regulators need tools that give them the ability to supervise and monitor VASP activities appropriately.

Because of the transparent nature of blockchain transactions, this audit trail can and should include the wallet addresses that are involved and the “fingerprint” of data transfer (timestamp, owner, and verified content) from originator to beneficiary and each step in between. 

In other words, the compliance framework must be consistent with that applied to a traditional regulated financial service provider processing payments and funds transfers.

Such audit capabilities are essential to the success of any Travel Rule implementation which is why we made them an integral part of Coinfirm’s All-in-One Travel Rule solution.

The Expectations of VASPs

In our view, VASPs must be licensed at the jurisdiction level and be subject to supervision and monitoring by competent national authorities rather than be self-regulating. Jurisdictions must also implement penalties, sanctions, and other enforcement measures when service providers fail to comply with their Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations. 

This regulatory control hinges on effective oversight. With Coinfirm’s solution, the wallet data available to regulators includes address profile/owner, risk score, and around 300 risk assessments along with further behavioral and risk analysis data. The audit trail displays data container names, document hashes, and document custody information.

Regulators must also be able to expect VASPs to do the following and be able to demonstrate compliance by providing a full audit trail:

  • Freeze transactions where applicable. Transaction freezes apply to transactions involving designated persons or locations in line with local and international sanctions lists. They also apply to other regulatory scenarios, such as transactions involving Politically Exposed Persons.
  • Manage and mitigate the risks of activities that involve anonymity-enhancing technologies or mechanisms. Within the world of crypto transactions, these include mixers, tumblers, and other similar technologies that bundle together transactions as a way to obfuscate the identity of the sender, recipient, holder, or beneficial owner of a Virtual Asset.
  • Flag unusual or suspicious movements of funds or transactions for further analysis. As obliged entities, VASPs should have appropriate systems so that they can scrutinise such funds or transactions in a timely manner and make a determination whether funds or transactions are suspicious.
  • Report suspicious funds or transactions. Such suspicious activities would include those involving or relating to wallets or providers (either VASPs or unregistered providers), escalating them as warranted to a jurisdiction’s financial intelligence unit. Reporting must be prompt, sufficient, and delivered in the manner specified by competent authorities.
  • Create and make available a list of blacklisted wallet addresses. If a VASP uncovers VA addresses that it has decided not to establish or continue business relations with or transact with due to suspicions of money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit activity, subject to the laws of the VASP’s jurisdiction. In turn, VASPs should screen customer and counterparty wallet addresses against available blacklisted wallet addresses as part of its ongoing monitoring and mitigation processes. 

The key to meeting regulatory expectations effectively and efficiently is taking a Risk-Based Approach. Even for the largest VASPs, time and resources are limited. It is impossible to scrutinize each transaction. In fact, that level of scrutiny is not even necessary.

The Key Balance of Risk

The Risk-Based Approach focuses on proportionate responses to managing financial crime risks based on characteristics such as:

  • Customer
  • Jurisdiction of the originator or beneficiary
  • Product or service
  • Transaction amount or variance from past behavior
  • Channel of delivery (e.g., non-face-to-face or anonymous)

VASPs and regulators should be able to view this information delivered via an easy-to-use and comprehensive platform, allowing overall monitoring as well as the ability to drill down into specific wallets and transactions. 

By defining risk characteristics and profiles in this way, VASPs can meet regulatory requirements without an extreme strain on resources. They can also demonstrate how their risk assessment policies and procedures are used to flag suspicious activity, and ultimately validate how their AML/CFT compliance and risk management program is adequate to meet the regulatory requirements.

But how do we get there from where we are today? 

A Question of Timing

As various jurisdictions draft and then implement their own regulatory frameworks in line with Travel Rule recommendations, they should be mindful of the degree of oversight and control available to them. The FATF continues to be engaged in discussions, but many countries have yet to legislate solutions or put them into practice.

Given that this will likely take some time, some countries may hesitate. They want to avoid creating a regulatory “disadvantage” that inhibits VASPs from operating and innovating. As a result, they have taken a more wait-and-see approach to monitor the development of solutions. Among these, we would include the United Kingdom and, to an extent, Japan. 

Other authorities, most notably FINCEN in the U.S., have taken the view that requirements equivalent to the Travel Rule requirements have been in place for many years. They have quickly applied them to Virtual Assets, at the risk of creating difficulties such as removing decentralization and other core benefits of cryptocurrency. 

There is a happy medium between inaction and premature, aggressive requirements. Others take the more pragmatic stance that adoption and implementation is a question of time, bringing government authorities, banks, VASPs, and industry groups together to try to begin to offer services and solutions. 

In our view, this deliberate approach, combined with a pragmatic view of risk-based transaction monitoring, strikes the right balance for VASPs and regulators. Critically, it helps avoid the risk of unintentionally becoming a haven for illicit financial activity via crypto, while at the same time leaving the door open to the right level of innovation and openness to an evolving virtual asset economy.



Read the original article here

- Advertisement -
Mr Bitcointe
Mr Bitcointehttps://www.bitcointe.com/
“Fact You Need To Know About Cryptocurrency - The first Bitcoin purchase was for pizza.” ― Mohsin Jameel
474FansLike
76FollowersFollow
4,567FollowersFollow
5,261FollowersFollow
1,551FollowersFollow
2,230SubscribersSubscribe
USD - United States Dollar
EUR
1.17
GBP
1.29
CHF
1.09
NOK
0.10
JPY
0.01
CAD
0.75
AUD
0.70

Most Popular

Japan is the ‘leading candidate’ for Ripple’s new headquarters: SBI Holdings CEO

Japanese financial giant SBI Holdings CEO Yoshitaka Kitao said that Japan is the most likely country Ripple will relocate to, should it leave...

Despite strong security token growth, tZERO continues to lose money

Despite explosive third-quarter growth in the security token sector, Overstock’s Q3 2020 earnings report reveals that its tZERO alternative trading system (ATS) has...

Wrapped Bitcoin is now Ethereum’s 6th Largest Token

Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) reached all-time highs today in terms of market capitalization and number of tokens.WBTC is the most popular version of Bitcoin tokenized...

The Hoff claims to have invented Bitcoin in 12th anniversary video

Nine celebrities with profiles on the sponsored video-sharing platform Cameo have published messages wishing Bitcoin (BTC) a happy birthday ahead of the twelfth anniversary...
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 13,165.52
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 378.47
ripple
XRP (XRP) $ 0.236010
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.998312
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 261.79
bitcoin-cash-sv
Bitcoin SV (BSV) $ 162.35
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 53.41
eos
EOS (EOS) $ 2.57
binancecoin
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 27.87
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 4.63
tezos
Tezos (XTZ) $ 1.80
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 1.27
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.090717
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 118.57
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.075150
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 10.87
huobi-token
Huobi Token (HT) $ 4.15
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.025873
usd-coin
USD Coin (USDC) $ 0.998917
dash
Dash (DASH) $ 65.46
neo
NEO (NEO) $ 14.22
iota
IOTA (MIOTA) $ 0.248338
nem
NEM (XEM) $ 0.094433
zcash
Zcash (ZEC) $ 55.17
maker
Maker (MKR) $ 520.82
paxos-standard
Paxos Standard (PAX) $ 0.992075
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 5.25
vechain
VeChain (VET) $ 0.009862
true-usd
TrueUSD (TUSD) $ 0.998746
ftx-token
FTX Token (FTT) $ 3.68
kucoin-shares
KuCoin Shares (KCS) $ 0.849017
waves
Waves (WAVES) $ 2.98